AbstractNumerous wellbore instability problems related to drilling through potentially fractured formations have been reported. Often, these rocks are characterized by the abundance of macro and micro scale bedding planes and/or networks of natural fractures. The presence of fractures weakens the rock mechanically and produces potentially higher-permeability fluid-flow paths within the low-permeability rock matrix. Practically, it is difficult to identify fracture size and fracture density without a costly core sample. A number of wellbore stability case studies have therefore been published where the author relied on anecdotal evidence to postulate failure mechanisms involving fractured rock, and recommendations for how to mitigate the observed instability range from increasing to decreasing the wellbore pressure.This paper presents results from a geomechanical investigation of a wellbore instability incident experienced in a fractured shale formation. As part of this assessment, a preserved core was obtained from the fractured shale interval and the presence of fractures was identified both by CAT scan and visual inspection. A series of triaxial tests were conducted to characterize the mechanical properties and failure strength of this shale. This data, combined with wellbore stability modeling, suggests that the residual strength, rather than the peak failure strength, is a more representative measure of a fractured rock's in-situ strength. The Hoek and Brown (1982) failure criterion was found to be particularly suitable for modeling fractured rock.Multi-arm caliper logs from two boreholes through the same fractured shale suggests that wellbore instability is more complex in the fractured interval than in the over- and underlying intact rock. These caliper logs also clearly demonstrate that the borehole quality was significantly improved by increasing the drilling fluid density, which contradicts the conclusions drawn in a number of published wellbore stability case studies (Santarelli et al., 1992; McClellan et al., 1996; Edwards et al., 2004; Fontana et al., 2007).