
doi: 10.2118/11413-ms
Abstract Recent in-situ measurements show that major discrepancies exist between accurately measured net bit pressure drop values and those predicted by previously accepted models and equations. The direction of the discrepancies is such that the measured values of net bit pressure drop are 20 per cent lower than those predicted by the existing models. Subsequent laboratory data obtained under rigorously monitored and controlled conditions support the field-taken downhole data. These data, as well as a possible explanation, are presented in this paper.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
