Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Reservoir and Production Characteristics of Composite Coal/Sandstone Gas Reservoirs

Authors: Rieke H.H.; F. Galliers;

Reservoir and Production Characteristics of Composite Coal/Sandstone Gas Reservoirs

Abstract

ABSTRACT Exploration for deep Atoka gas reservoirs during the past 10 years in the Arkoma basin of Oklahoma has provided opportunities to obtain reservoir and production data from shallow. Pennsylvanian age, Hartshorne composite coal/sandstone gas reservoirs. The Hartshorne formation by itself is not normally considered to be a potential secondary target if gas shows are evident and the deeper zone is non-productive. Independent operators, however, have been completing shallow wells (<2000 feet) in the Hartshorne formation for over sixty-five years. Four hydraulically stimulated wells, each having eight years of Hartshorne production history, were chosen to be analyzed. All four of the gas wells are situated on the northern flank of the Kiowa syncline, Pittsburg County, Oklahoma and are located within three miles of each other. The range in depth for the producing Hartshorne intervals in these wells is from about 3000 feet to 4200 feet. Geophysical well logs, seismic data, sample cutting and core descriptions, gas composition data, well test information and production decline curve analyses were used to characterize the reservoir geology and to estimate the reserves and recovery of these composite reservoirs. Reserve estimates ranged from .04 BCF to 0.5 BCF per well. Well data suggests that in-fill drilling between these four wells has the potential of recovering more gas. Analysis of the reservoir geology indicates a deltaic-fluvial depositional environment that has several lateral discontinuities in the gaseous Hartshorne coalbed. The geologic data shows that the coalbed can split into as many as three identifiable seams in some parts of the syncline.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!