Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Sen i Gakkaishiarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Sen i Gakkaishi
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Sen i Gakkaishi
Article . 2000 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Fabric Hand Evaluation Using Qualitative Data

Authors: Toshihiko Amano; Yuko Maenaka; Taeko Kitaura; Kazuyuki Obara;

Fabric Hand Evaluation Using Qualitative Data

Abstract

We tried to evaluate the objective hand value of a fabric by using not numerical but only qualitative data for its properties, such as large/small, high/low, excellent/poor and so on. In the analysis, SHINAYAKASA (Flexibility with soft feeling) of women’s dress fabrics defined in the KES method was used as an objective measure of a sample fabric. The measured data with a KES apparatus were converted to the qualitative values by comparing the measured data with settled standards. These qualitative data of 187 samples were statistically analyzed by the quantification theory I. The multiple correlation coefficient between SHINAYAKASA of the KES method and that estimated by using the parameters obtained in the analysis was 0.92. The number of items used in the analysis was largely reduced from 16 to 7, that is, WT, B, G, WC, MMD, SMD, and W. These results indicate that the objective evaluation of fabric hand using qualitative data can be in practical use at a similar level of the KES method.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
bronze