
doi: 10.21149/12499
pmid: 35438916
Objective. To examine the factor structure of the 4- and 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) among 1 310 Mexican women participating in a prospective cancer cohort study. Materials and methods. We performed exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in two sub-samples of the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort. We evaluated internal consistency, estimated the correlation between PSS-4 and PSS-10, and assessed their correlation with a depressive symptoms scale. Results. Two-factor models were the solutions with the best fit to the data for both PSS-4 and -10, exhibiting strong factor loadings (0.39 to 0.75) and high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.72 and 0.83). The correlation between PSS-4 and PSS-10 was r=0.91 and the correlations of these two scales with a depressive symptoms scale were r=0.41 and r=0.46, respectively. Conclusions. PSS might be an adequate scale to assess perceived stress in this prospective cancer cohort study. PSS-4 may be advantageous due to its simplicity, low cost, and short application time in multicountry studies on stress and cancer.
Psychometrics, perceived stress, factor analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, cancer, Humans, Female, women, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Stress, Psychological
Psychometrics, perceived stress, factor analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, cancer, Humans, Female, women, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Stress, Psychological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
