Enthesis Repair

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 15 Aug 2018 English Publisher:Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)Journal:Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, volume 100, page e109 (issn: 0021-9355, eissn: 1535-1386,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Kathleen A. Derwin; Leesa M. Galatz; Anthony Ratcliffe; Stavros Thomopoulos;

doi: 10.2106/jbjs.18.00200

pmid: 30106830

pmc: PMC6133216

Enthesis Repair

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Abstract: On May 22, 2017, the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) hosted a roundtable on “Innovative Treatments for Enthesis Repair.” A summary of the roundtable discussion, as well as a list of the extramural participants, can be found at https://www.niams.nih.gov/about/meetings-events/roundtables/roundtable-innovative-treatments-enthesis-repair. This paper reviews the challenges and opportunities for developing effective treatment strategies for enthesis repair that were identified at the roundtable discussion.

Related Organizations

Cleveland Clinic
United States
Columbia University
United States
Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute
United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
United States
King’s University
United States

Keywords

Wound Healing, Tendon Injuries, Humans, Bone and Bones

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	81
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%