Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Complications of Shoulder Arthroplasty

Authors: Kamal I, Bohsali; Aaron J, Bois; Michael A, Wirth;

Complications of Shoulder Arthroplasty

Abstract

Update This article was updated on May 17, 2017, because of a previous error. On page 256, the sentence that had read “The current analysis revealed a total of 19,262 TSAs and RSAs at a mean follow-up of 40.3 months in 122 studies, with an overall complication rate of 7.4% (2,122 complications)3-124” now reads “The current analysis revealed a total of 19,262 TSAs and RSAs at a mean follow-up of 40.3 months in 122 studies, with an overall complication rate of 11% (2,122 complications)3-124.” An erratum has been published: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 June 21;99(12):e67. The most common complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in order of decreasing frequency included instability, periprosthetic fracture, infection, component loosening, neural injury, acromial and/or scapular spine fracture, hematoma, deltoid injury, rotator cuff tear, and venous thromboembolism (VTE).The most common complications after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in order of decreasing frequency were component loosening, glenoid wear, instability, rotator cuff tear, periprosthetic fracture, neural injury, infection, hematoma, deltoid injury, and VTE.Glenoid component wear and loosening remain a common cause of failure after anatomic TSA, despite advances in surgical technique and implant design.Diagnostic confirmation of infection after shoulder arthroplasty remains a challenge. In the setting of a painful and stiff shoulder after arthroplasty, the surgeon should have a heightened suspicion for infection. Inflammatory markers may be normal, radiographs may be inconclusive, and prosthetic joint aspiration may be negative for a causative organism.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Postoperative Complications, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    327
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 0.1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 0.1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
327
Top 0.1%
Top 1%
Top 0.1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!