Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The Prison Industrial Complex as a Commercial Determinant of Health

Authors: Daniel Eisenkraft, Klein; Joana Madureira, Lima;

The Prison Industrial Complex as a Commercial Determinant of Health

Abstract

A CDOH lens allows not only an exploration of commercial aspects of mass incarceration but also of power asymmetries in the institutionalization of racism in societal structures, and of how it enables the commodification of African Americans and other minorities for the profit motive. [...]CDOH frameworks incorporate theories of power to guide the study of the structural factors that enable corporate influence on health. A relatively recent Washington Post article outlined the many strategies that PIC actors have used to extensively shape the policy environment, including lobbying, providing direct campaign contributions, and building relationships and networks to a range of state and federal politicians, often leading to the awarding of state contracts for high-price prisons (https://wapo.st/ 3bWHtjM). [...]in recent decades, the same private actors involved in the prison sector have expanded their operations to encompass migrant detention centers. [...]although the health harms of mass incarceration have been well documented, the impacts of the PIC, both in terms of private prisons and the broader set of industries that profit from mass incarceration, have received far less attention. In other words, the PIC draws its profits from those at the bottom of the socioeconomic scale, including both incarcerated individuals and their families. [...]US incarceration is deeply stratified by race, with African Americans five times more likely to be imprisoned than Whites.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Social Determinants of Health, Health Status, Prisoners, United States, Prisons, Humans, Minority Groups, Quality of Health Care

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!