
Abstract The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare the sensory quality of chocolate mousses made from two kinds of chocolate, namely compound and couverture. This study was conducted in the Pastry Laboratory, Culinary Arts Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Jakarta from December 2019 to January 2022. This study used the experimental research method. U Mann Whitney test results show that there are significant differences in the sensory quality aspects with a significance level of α = 0.05.The analysis results show that the higher average scores between the two kinds of chocolate are as follows: in the color aspect was 3.4 for couverture chocolate (dark brown category), in the aroma aspect was 4.2 for couverture chocolate (somewhat strong chocolate aroma category), in the taste (sweetness) aspect was 4.5 for compound (sweet category), in the taste (chocolate flavor) aspect was 4.76 for couverture chocolate (rich chocolate flavor category), and in the texture aspect was 4.5 for compound chocolate (soft texture category). It is concluded that there are significant differences in color, aroma, taste (sweetness), and taste (chocolate flavor) aspects of sensory quality and no significant difference in the texture aspect. Keyword : Chocolate Mousse, Compound Chocolate, Couverture Chocolate, Sensory Quality
Cokelat Compound, Chocolate Mousse, Compound Chocolate, Sensory Quality, Cokelat Couverture, Couverture Chocolate, Mutu Sensoris
Cokelat Compound, Chocolate Mousse, Compound Chocolate, Sensory Quality, Cokelat Couverture, Couverture Chocolate, Mutu Sensoris
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
