Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Learning Lettersarrow_drop_down
Learning Letters
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Capturing students' cognitive engagement using the ICAP framework

A scoping review
Authors: Ruchini Jayasinghe; Sisi Liu; Hansani Thanippuli Kankanamalage; Rupinderdeep Kaur; Danda Li;

Capturing students' cognitive engagement using the ICAP framework

Abstract

Student cognitive engagement (CE) is crucial as it reflects students’ investment in academic achievement. To conceptualise different dimensions of CE, the Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP) framework is widely adopted. While ICAP has been applied in higher education (HE), existing studies are often fragmented, context-specific, or limited to a specific learning environment. Although broader CE strategies have been reviewed, a comprehensive review of practices and methodologies used to capture CE through ICAP across diverse settings is lacking. Therefore, this study reviews 42 peer-reviewed articles using PRISMA methodology to explore current practices in capturing student CE via ICAP in HE. It highlights ICAP applications in face-to-face (36%), online (52%), and hybrid (12%) learning environments, and captures CE mainly across physical learning materials (29%), and online discussion forums (29%). Some studies employed interviews and questionnaire surveys to collect data, while others extracted data from learning management systems. Most studies manually mapped CE to ICAP (57%), which limits their scalability and generalisation. Therefore, there is a compelling need for automated approaches, such as the integration of machine learning models. This study offers valuable insights for educators and researchers on the relevance and versatility of ICAP in capturing CE across varied learning environments and contexts.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!