
doi: 10.20381/ruor-13272
handle: 10393/30069
Due the sheer size and complexity of genomes, it is essential to develop automated methods to analyze them. To compare genomes, one distance measure that has been proposed is to determine the minimum number of evolutionary changes needed to transform one genome into another. In recent years, great progress has been made in this area with efficient exact algorithms that can transform one genome to another applying a wide range of evolutionary operations. However, gene duplications, a common occurrence and arguably the most important evolutionary operation, have proven to be one of the most difficult evolutionary operations to integrate. We examine the most successful gene duplication algorithms: a family of algorithms that we call the rearrangement-duplication algorithms. Rather than compare two genomes, these algorithms attempt to efficiently remove the duplicates from a genome using the fewest number of duplications and other evolutionary operations. In this thesis we give a complete survey of all the genome halving algorithms, a highly successful group of rearrangement-duplication algorithms that efficiently and exactly handle whole genome doubling ( tetraploidization). We also introduce the genome aliquoting algorithms, a new variation on the genome halving problem, that attempts to handle unlimited scale whole genome duplications. As a new and challenging problem there are currently no efficient exact algorithms. However, early results include two approximation algorithms.
Biology, Bioinformatics., Bioinformatics, Computer Science, 006, Computer Science., Biology
Biology, Bioinformatics., Bioinformatics, Computer Science, 006, Computer Science., Biology
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
