
Abstract: Successful object manipulation is fundamental to maintaining an independent lifestyle and, as a result, several tests have been used to assess hand function. The maximum grip strength test is one of the most used, but its validity could be questioned because, among other aspects, we rarely use maximum grip strength (GSMax) during daily manipulation task. Thus, the main aim of this study was to examine the relationship between GSMax and the performance in a hand dexterity task. Twenty-four healthy adults (12 males) between 20 and 39 years of age performed the nine hole peg test (9-HPT) and the maximum grip strength test (Jamar® hydraulic hand dynamometer). The results revealed that males were stronger than females and dominant hand was stronger than non-dominant hand. Moreover, males and females had similar performance in the 9-HPT, but both groups had better performance when using their dominant hand compared to their non-dominant one. Finally, and most importantly, the results revealed that there was no significant relationship between GSMax and individuals’ performance in the 9-HPT. The lack of relationship between them indicates that digits dexterity assessed by 9-HPT is not dependent on maximum grip strength exerted by the hand, suggesting that the evaluation of hand function should not be only based upon the results of the maximum grip strength test. Consequently, other grip strength related measurements (e.g., rate of grip force development, grip force control) should be taken into consideration for hand function assessment.Key Words: Upper limb, evaluation, motor skill, force.Â
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
