
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>To determine the types of various dental restorative materials used, and the reasons for the placement and replacement of dental restorations in 10 randomly selected polyclinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.A cross-sectional descriptive study.Ten selected polyclinics in Riyadh metropolitan area, Saudi Arabia during a period of two weeks in January 2003.Information was collected by using a specially-designed form that was distributed to one dentist in each selected polyclinic. The dentists were asked to record specific details for all restorations placed in adult patients. Chi-square tests were used to analyze the data.Data were collected for 326 restorations. Amalgam (52.5%) was the most commonly used restorative material followed by resin composite (31.3%) and temporary restorations (14.4%), with a minimal use of glass ionomer cement (1.8%, p<0.001). Most of the restorations (69.9%) were initial placements, while 30.1% were replacement restorations, (p<0.05). Caries was the major reason for the initial placement (92.1%), and for the subsequent replacement (96.9%) of restorations.Amalgam and resin composite were the most commonly used restorative materials. Caries was the major reason for the initial restoration placements and subsequent replacements.
Adult, 670, Cross-Sectional Studies, Adolescent, Retreatment, Humans, Dental Restoration Failure, Dental Caries, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Dental Amalgam
Adult, 670, Cross-Sectional Studies, Adolescent, Retreatment, Humans, Dental Restoration Failure, Dental Caries, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Dental Amalgam
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
