Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Application of Antinuclear Antibody and Antinuclear Antibody Spectrum in Lymphoma Treatment].

Authors: Chun-Mei Fan; Mei-E Wang;

[Application of Antinuclear Antibody and Antinuclear Antibody Spectrum in Lymphoma Treatment].

Abstract

To investigate the significance of antinuclear antibody and antinuclear antibody spectrum in the stage and prognosis of lymphoma patients.79 cases of lymphoma (lymphoma group) treated in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University and 50 cases of healthy people (control group) were selected. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) were detected by indirect innmunofluorescence and ANA spectrums were detected by linear Western blot, the expression level of ANA and ANA spectrum in the two groups were analyzed. The lymphoma group was divided into the positive and the negative group according to ANA level, the levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), white blood cell (WBC), disease type, stage and prognosis of the two groups were compared.In the lymphoma group, the positive rate of ANA was 48.1%, while the positive rate was 8.0% in the health control group, both of them showed statistically significant (χ2=22.42, P<0.05). ANA fluorescence karyotype in lymphoma group was mainly speckle type. In the Lymphoma group, the positive rate of ANA spectrum was 29.1%, while the positive rate in the control group was 4.0%, both of them showed statistically significant (χ2=12.36, P<0.05). The target antigen distribution of ANA spectrum in the lymphoma group was relatively complex, mainly RO52 and SSA, while that in the control group was simple. The positive rate of ANA in lymphoma patients showed increased with age, the titer was mainly 1∶100 low titer positive, the positive rate of ANA in female patients was higher than that in male patients; The average count±standard deviation of LDH and WBC in the ANA positive and negative group were (253.67±255.85) U/L, (218.18±208.34) U/L, (6.34±3.31)×109/L and (6.81±3.91)×109/L respectively, which showed no statistical significance between the two groups (t=0.59 P>0.05; t=0.57 P>0.05); B-cell lymphoma was the main disease in both groups, which accounted for 81.6% (31/38) and 68.3% (28/41) respectively; while in B-cell lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the main lymphoma. For the patients with B-cell lymphoma, the patients at stage IV in ANA positive group was 58.1% (18/31), while that in the ANA negative group was 28.6% (8 / 28), and both of them showed statistically significant (χ2=5.19, P<0.05). Follow-up showed that the survival rate of the patients in ANA negative group was higher than that in ANA positive group, which showed statistically significant difference (P<0.05).The postive rate of antinuclear antibody and antinuclear antibody spectrum are higher in lymphoma patients, which have considerable significance for the stage and prognosis of lymphoma treatment.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Lymphoma, Antibodies, Antinuclear, Blotting, Western, Humans, Female, Prognosis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?