Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Periodont...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Periodontology
Article . 1992 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Comparison of Two Techniques for Attaining Root Coverage

Authors: Victor G. Saunders; James B. Laney; Jerry J. Garnick;

A Comparison of Two Techniques for Attaining Root Coverage

Abstract

This study compared the relative success of soft tissue coverage of denuded roots by two surgical procedures: Autogenous free gingival graft (FGG) and a 2‐stage coronallypositioned flap (CPF). Eight patients who had bilateral areas of gingival recession were selected. The areas of recession treated were Class I or II according to Miller's classification and caused either an esthetic problem or root sensitivity. The defects were randomly assigned to surgical procedures in each subject. In the FGG, the root surfaces were root planed, conditioned with a saturated citric acid solution, and an adjacent recipient site was prepared surgically. A thick palatal graft was then sutured to the recipient site. In the CPF, an initial autogenous free gingival graft was surgically placed in a recipient site just apical to the root recession. After 1 month of healing, the gingiva was coronally positioned to the level of the CEJ. Standardized photographs were obtained presurgically, at 2 weeks, and at 1 and 3 months. Reduction of areas of exposed root surface and distances from CEJ to gingival margin were computed. Data analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in success between FGG and CPF at 3 months. Maximum decrease of exposed root surfaces occurred at 2 weeks postsurgically with both procedures and then some recession of each type of graft occurred. The mean distance of the exposed root surfaces decreased from 2.136 mm to 1.301 mm and from 2.187 mm to 1.400 from baseline to 3 months for the FGG and CPF respectively. The area of root exposure was reduced from 6.692 mm2 to 3.705 mm2 and from 6.949 mm2 to 3.841 mm2 for the FFG and CPF respectively. Thus, the null hypothesis was accepted in that there were no differences in root surface coverage by CPF and FGG procedures. J Periodontol 1992; 63:19–23.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Dental Cementum, Male, Time Factors, Gingiva, Middle Aged, Surgical Flaps, Root Planing, Acid Etching, Dental, Humans, Female, Gingival Recession, Tooth Root, Dental Enamel

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    42
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
42
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!