
doi: 10.1889/1.2433164
Abstract Interfaces play a critical role in determining the performance of organic light‐emitting diodes and related organic electronic devices. Various models and mechanisms have been advocated to elucidate the formation of charge‐injection barrier at organic/metal interfaces. Charge‐injection barrier at organic/metal interfaces has been commonly described as a function of metal work function, although a large scatter exists in experimental data. We introduce the electronegativity concept to characterize the variation of the carrier injection barrier heights at the metal/organic interfaces. We show that the interface barrier heights can be described nicely as a linear function of the metal electronegativity for a number of organic materials. The physical basis for using electronegativity rather than work function is discussed. Barrier height formation is associated with the difference in electronegativity of metals and organics that causes charge transfer at the interface between the two solids. The feasibility of extending the concept of electronegativity to compound electrodes (e.g., indium tin oxide) which do not have a well‐defined electronegativity is also explored.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
