
Цель работы – повышение качеÑтва результата процеÑÑа «РаÑчет ÑтоимоÑти» за Ñчёт ÑÐ½Ð¸Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾ÑˆÐ¸Ð±Ð¾Ðº в раÑчетах ÑтоимоÑти. Задачи работы: 1. Ðнализ процеÑÑа «РаÑчет ÑтоимоÑти» в компании «Rem&Coil»; 2. Разработка ÑиÑтемы критериев оценки процеÑÑа; 3. Создание функциональной модели «Как еÑть» и выÑвление требующих переÑмотра Ñлементов нынешнего процеÑÑа; 4. Создание функциональной модели «Как должно быть»; 5. Разработка плана Ð²Ð½ÐµÐ´Ñ€ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑƒÐ»ÑƒÑ‡ÑˆÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¹, проведение измерений и оценка результата; 6. Разработка календарного плана и бюджета, анализ риÑков проекта. Ð’ ходе работы была выÑвлена проблема – Снижение ÑффективноÑти процеÑÑа «РаÑчет ÑтоимоÑти» из-за Ð²Ð¾Ð·Ð½Ð¸ÐºÐ½Ð¾Ð²ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð² техничеÑком отделе ошибок в раÑчетах ÑтоимоÑти. Ðайдены причины Ð²Ð¾Ð·Ð½Ð¸ÐºÐ½Ð¾Ð²ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾ÑˆÐ¸Ð±Ð¾Ðº и предложены Ñ€ÐµÑˆÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ их уÑтранению. Определены Ñтапы Ð²Ð½ÐµÐ´Ñ€ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑƒÐ»ÑƒÑ‡ÑˆÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¹ и приведены ожидаемые результаты от ÑовершенÑÑ‚Ð²Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ñ€Ð¾Ñ†ÐµÑÑа.
The purpose of the work is to improve the quality of the result of the «Cost Calculation» process by reducing errors in cost calculations. Tasks of the work: 1. Analysis of the "Cost calculation" process in the company «Rem&Coil»; 2. Development of a system of process evaluation criteria; 3. Creating a functional model «As is» and identifying elements of the current process that require revision; 4. Creating a functional model «How it should be»; 5. Development of an improvement implementation plan, measurement and evaluation of the result; 6. Development of a calendar plan and budget, risk analysis of the project. In the course of the work, a problem was identified – a decrease in the efficiency of the «Cost Calculation» process due to the occurrence of errors in cost calculations in the technical department. The causes of errors have been found and solutions for their elimination have been proposed. The stages of implementation of improvements are defined and the expected results from process improvement are given.
пÑоÑеÑÑ ÑаÑÑеÑа ÑÑоимоÑÑи, ways to reduce errors, ÑовеÑÑенÑÑвование пÑоÑеÑÑа, logical and structural approach, анализ пÑоÑеÑÑа, оÑибки в ÑаÑÑеÑÐ°Ñ ÑÑоимоÑÑи, ÑпоÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ ÑÐ½Ð¸Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾Ñибок, errors in cost calculations, project management, process improvement, process analysis, cost calculation process, логико-ÑÑÑÑкÑÑÑнÑй Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ñ Ð¾Ð´, ÑпÑавление пÑоекÑом
пÑоÑеÑÑ ÑаÑÑеÑа ÑÑоимоÑÑи, ways to reduce errors, ÑовеÑÑенÑÑвование пÑоÑеÑÑа, logical and structural approach, анализ пÑоÑеÑÑа, оÑибки в ÑаÑÑеÑÐ°Ñ ÑÑоимоÑÑи, ÑпоÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ ÑÐ½Ð¸Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾Ñибок, errors in cost calculations, project management, process improvement, process analysis, cost calculation process, логико-ÑÑÑÑкÑÑÑнÑй Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ñ Ð¾Ð´, ÑпÑавление пÑоекÑом
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
