<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Предметом иÑÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑвлÑÑŽÑ‚ÑÑ Ñ‚ÐµÑ…Ð½Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸Ð¸ раÑпределенного рееÑтра, позволÑющие производить аудит и ÑƒÐ¿Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð°Ð¼Ð¸ доÑтупа в гетерогенных хранилищах Больших данных. Целью работы ÑвлÑетÑÑ Ð°ÑƒÐ´Ð¸Ñ‚ и ÑƒÐ¿Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð°Ð¼Ð¸ доÑтупа в гетерогенных хранилищах Больших данных на оÑнове технологии раÑпределенного рееÑтра. Задачи, которые решалиÑÑŒ в ходе иÑÑледованиÑ: 1. Проведение анализа гетерогенных хранилищ Больших данных и технологий раÑпределенного рееÑтра Ñ Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ‡ÐºÐ¸ Ð·Ñ€ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñ†ÐµÐ»Ð¸ работы. 2. Разработка ÑпоÑоба аудита в гетерогенных ÑиÑтемах Больших данных на оÑнове технологии раÑпределенного рееÑтра. 3. Разработка ÑпоÑоба ÑƒÐ¿Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð°Ð¼Ð¸ доÑтупа в гетерогенных ÑиÑтемах Больших данных. 4. Разработка и Ñ€ÐµÐ°Ð»Ð¸Ð·Ð°Ñ†Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ñ€Ð¾Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ‚Ð¸Ð¿Ð°, обеÑпечивающего аудит и контроль доÑтупа в гетерогенных хранилищах Больших данных, ÑкÑÐ¿ÐµÑ€Ð¸Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ñ‚Ð°Ð»ÑŒÐ½Ð°Ñ Ð¾Ñ†ÐµÐ½ÐºÐ° предложенных решений. Проведен Ñравнительный анализ технологий раÑпределенного рееÑтра и выбраны наиболее подходÑщие технологии и предложены Ñтратегии переноÑа прав между различными моделÑми данных. Ð’ результате работы был реализован инÑтрумент Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð°ÑƒÐ´Ð¸Ñ‚Ð° и ÑƒÐ¿Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð°Ð¼Ð¸ в раÑÑматриваемых ÑиÑтемах и выÑвлено, что решение не вноÑит больших накладных раÑходов в процеÑÑе Ñ„ÑƒÐ½ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ð¾Ð½Ð¸Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸ может быть применен как инÑтрумент аудита и ÑƒÐ¿Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð°Ð¼Ð¸.
The subject of the research is distributed ledger technologies that allow auditing and managing access rights in heterogeneous Big Data storages. The aim of the work is to audit and manage access rights in heterogeneous Big Data storages based on distributed ledger technology. The research set the following goals: 1. Analysis of heterogeneous Big Data storages and distributed ledger technologies from the point of view of the purpose of the work. 2. Development of an audit method in heterogeneous Big Data systems based on distributed ledger technology. 3. Development of a method for managing access rights in heterogeneous Big Data systems. 4. Development and implementation of a prototype that provides audit and access control in heterogeneous Big Data storages, experimental evaluation of the proposed solutions. A comparative analysis of distributed registry technologies was carried out, the most appropriate technologies were selected, and strategies for transferring rights between different data models were proposed. As a result of the work, a tool for auditing and rights management was implemented in the systems under consideration and it was found that the solution does not introduce large overhead costs in the process of operation and can be used as an audit and rights management tool.
ÑаÑпÑеделеннÑй ÑееÑÑÑ, blockchain, hashgraph, big data, конÑÑÐ¾Ð»Ñ Ð´Ð¾ÑÑÑпа, access control, геÑеÑогеннÑе Ñ ÑанилиÑа даннÑÑ, heterogeneous data storage, болÑÑие даннÑе, destributed ledger
ÑаÑпÑеделеннÑй ÑееÑÑÑ, blockchain, hashgraph, big data, конÑÑÐ¾Ð»Ñ Ð´Ð¾ÑÑÑпа, access control, геÑеÑогеннÑе Ñ ÑанилиÑа даннÑÑ, heterogeneous data storage, болÑÑие даннÑе, destributed ledger
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |