
Тема выпуÑкной квалификационной работы: «БизнеÑ-центр выÑотой 117 метров в г. Санкт-Петербург». Ð”Ð°Ð½Ð½Ð°Ñ Ñ€Ð°Ð±Ð¾Ñ‚Ð° была выполнена Ñ Ñ†ÐµÐ»ÑŒÑŽ оценки риÑков инвеÑтиционно-Ñтроительного проекта. РаÑчеты и анализ были проведены на примере админиÑтративного Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð±Ð¸Ð·Ð½ÐµÑ-центра выÑотой 117 метров. Ð’ ходе иÑÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð±Ñ‹Ð»Ð¸ поÑтавлены Ñледующие задачи: 1. Разработать проектную документацию на ÑтроительÑтво бизнеÑ-центра в Ñоот-ветÑтвии Ñ Ð·Ð°Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸ÐµÐ¼ на проектирование и поÑтановлением ПравительÑтва РФ от 16.02.2008 â„–87 «О ÑоÑтаве разделов проектной документации и требований к их Ñодержанию»; 2. Проанализировать риÑки методом ÑкÑпертных оценок; 3. Дать рекомендации по минимизации наиболее значимых риÑков; 4. Проанализировать риÑки методом Ñценариев; 5. Дать оценку ÑффективноÑти инвеÑтиционного проекта. ИÑпользование метода ÑкÑпертных оценок и метода Ñценариев позволÑет определить риÑки в Ñтроительной Ñфере. ПроизводитÑÑ Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð· полученных данных и принÑтие Ñ€ÐµÑˆÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾ целеÑообразноÑти финанÑÐ¸Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ñ€Ð¾ÐµÐºÑ‚Ð°. Ð’ результате данной работы был произведен анализ риÑков инвеÑтиционно-Ñтроительного проекта, и на оÑнове Ñтого был Ñделан вывод о том, что проект будет окупаем при любом Ñценарии развитиÑ, Ñледовательно проект ÑвлÑетÑÑ Ð²Ñ‹Ð³Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ‹Ð¼ Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¸Ð½Ð²ÐµÑторов. РиÑки проекта можно Ñчитать минимальны.
The subject of the graduate qualification work is “117-meter business center in St. Peters-burgâ€. This work was done to assess the risks of an investment construction project. Calculations and analysis were carried out on the example of the administrative building of a business center 117 me-ters high. During the study, the following tasks were set: 1. to develop a project documentation for the construction of a research Institute in ac-cordance with the design assignment and the RF Government Resolution N 87 of Feb-ruary 16, 2008 On the structure of sections of design documentation and requirements to their contents; 2. To analyze the risks by the method of expert evaluations; 3. Give recommendations to minimize the most significant risks; 4. Analyze risks using the scenario method; 5. To assess the effectiveness of the investment project. Using the expert assessment method and the scenario method allows you to identify risks in the construction industry. An analysis of the data obtained and a decision on the feasibility of financ-ing the project. As a result of this work, an additional estimate was made, then an analysis was made of the obtained construction costs of the underground part of the building, and on the basis of this, it was concluded that the sheet piling method is the most economically feasible method for the construction of the underground part of a high-rise administrative building, provided that it’s technically possible to use both methods.
scenario method, ÑÑÑоиÑелÑÑÑво, building, меÑод ÑÑенаÑиев, expert evaluation method, risk assessment, ÑиÑк, оÑенка ÑиÑков, меÑод ÑкÑпеÑÑнÑÑ Ð¾Ñенок, risk
scenario method, ÑÑÑоиÑелÑÑÑво, building, меÑод ÑÑенаÑиев, expert evaluation method, risk assessment, ÑиÑк, оÑенка ÑиÑков, меÑод ÑкÑпеÑÑнÑÑ Ð¾Ñенок, risk
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
