<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Лечение детей Ñ Ñ†ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ±Ñ€Ð°Ð»ÑŒÐ½Ñ‹Ð¼ параличом неотделимо от реабилитационного оборудованиÑ. Ð’ данной иÑÑледование анализируетÑÑ Ñ‡Ð°Ñтота иÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð»ÑŒÐ·Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ñ‚ÐµÑ…Ð½Ð¸Ñ‡ÐµÑких ÑредÑтв Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñ€ÐµÐ°Ð±Ð¸Ð»Ð¸Ñ‚Ð°Ñ†Ð¸Ð¸ церебрального паралича в больницах, и результаты ÑоглаÑуютÑÑ Ñ Ð¸ÑÑледованиÑми ÑоÑтоÑÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð´ÐµÑ‚ÐµÐ¹ Ñ Ñ†ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ±Ñ€Ð°Ð»ÑŒÐ½Ñ‹Ð¼ параличом; уÑтановлено, что данные иÑÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ñледует раÑширить. Ðто подтверждаетÑÑ Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð·Ð¾Ð¼ данных, полученных при ÑопоÑтавлении роботов Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñ€ÐµÐ°Ð±Ð¸Ð»Ð¸Ñ‚Ð°Ñ†Ð¸Ð¸ нижних конечноÑтей. Сравнительный анализ 11 иÑÑледований роботов-реабилитаторов нижних конечноÑтей у детей Ñ Ñ†ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ±Ñ€Ð°Ð»ÑŒÐ½Ñ‹Ð¼ параличом показал отÑутÑтвие Ñтандартов и небольшое количеÑтво анализируемого материала. Методы, иÑпользуемые иÑÑледователÑми, не полноÑтью ÑоглаÑованы, поÑтому результаты недоÑтаточно убедительны. ПредлагаетÑÑ Ñоздать ÑиÑтему оценки, ÐºÐ¾Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ€Ð°Ñ Ð±ÑƒÐ´ÐµÑ‚ иметь большое значение Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð±ÑƒÐ´ÑƒÑ‰Ð¸Ñ… иÑÑледований реабилитационного оборудованиÑ.
Treatment of children with cerebral palsy is inseparable from rehabilitation equipment. This study analyzes the frequency of using technical means for the rehabilitation of cerebral palsy in hospitals, and the results are consistent with studies of the state of children with cerebral palsy. We found that these studies should be expanded. This is confirmed by the analysis of data obtained when comparing robots for the rehabilitation of lower extremities. Comparative analysis of 11 studies of robot rehabilitators of the lower limbs in children with cerebral palsy showed a lack of standards and a small amount of material to be analyzed. The methods used by the researchers are not entirely consistent, so the results are not conclusive. It is proposed to create an evaluation system that will be of great importance for future research on rehabilitation equipment.
ÑобоÑ-ÑеабилиÑаÑÐ¾Ñ Ð½Ð¸Ð¶Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÐµÑноÑÑи, ÑеабилиÑаÑионное обоÑÑдование, ÑеабилиÑаÑÐ¸Ñ Ð½Ð¸Ð¶Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÐµÑноÑÑей, ÑаÑÑоÑа иÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð»Ð¸Ð·Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¢Ð¡Ð, ТСÐ, медико-ÑоÑиалÑÐ½Ð°Ñ ÑеабилиÑаÑиÑ, ÐЦÐ
ÑобоÑ-ÑеабилиÑаÑÐ¾Ñ Ð½Ð¸Ð¶Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÐµÑноÑÑи, ÑеабилиÑаÑионное обоÑÑдование, ÑеабилиÑаÑÐ¸Ñ Ð½Ð¸Ð¶Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÐµÑноÑÑей, ÑаÑÑоÑа иÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð»Ð¸Ð·Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¢Ð¡Ð, ТСÐ, медико-ÑоÑиалÑÐ½Ð°Ñ ÑеабилиÑаÑиÑ, ÐЦÐ
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |