
doi: 10.18653/v1/w16-0427
The recent rise of social media has greatly democratized content creation. Facebook, Twitter, Skype, Whatsapp and LiveJournal are now commonly used to share thoughts and opinions about anything in the surrounding world. This proliferation of social media content has created new opportunities to study public opinion, with Twitter being especially popular for research due to its scale, representativeness, variety of topics discussed, as well as ease of public access to its messages. Unfortunately, research in that direction was hindered by the unavailability of suitable datasets and lexicons for system training, development and testing. While some Twitter-specific resources were developed, initially they were either small and proprietary, such as the i-sieve corpus (Kouloumpis et al., 2011), were created only for Spanish like the TASS corpus (Villena-Rom´
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
