Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista de la Facult...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de la Universidad de Cuenca
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Monitoreo electrónico fetal: predictor de compromiso de bienestar fetal en embarazos de bajo y alto riesgo obstétrico

Authors: Jaime Adrián Chávez Webster; Zoila Katherine Salazar Torres; Kimberly Nicole Sandoya Maza; Hernán Alejandro Ramírez Morales;

Monitoreo electrónico fetal: predictor de compromiso de bienestar fetal en embarazos de bajo y alto riesgo obstétrico

Abstract

Introducción: el monitoreo electrónico fetal (MEF) durante el trabajo del parto puede contribuir a la prevención de crisis epilépticas neonatales; su validez en embarazos de bajo riesgo está aún por investigarse. Objetivo: estimar la validez del MEF como predictor de compromiso de bienestar fetal en embarazos de bajo y alto riesgo obstétrico. Metodología: estudio de validación de test diagnóstico. La población estuvo constituida por 412 gestantes con embarazo a término en labor de parto que acudieron a un hospital de tercer nivel de atención en Cuenca – Ecuador, año 2020. Se usó una ficha de recolección de datos fue validado por juicio de expertos. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el programa SPSS 25 con medidas de frecuencias y dispersión central. Para determinar el valor predictivo del MEF se utilizaron sensibilidad (S), especificidad (E), valor predictivo positivo (VPP), valor predictivo negativo (VPN) y curva ROC. Resultados: el MEF en pacientes con riesgo obstétrico alto, como predictor del compromiso de bienestar fetal al minuto, tuvo una S = 30%, VPP = 5%, E = 80.94% y valor VPN 94.93%. Asimismo, el MEF tuvo valor pronóstico bajo, sin significancia estadística (AUC= 0.5537; IC95% 0.4020 – 0.7054; p= 0.0774) para predecir compromiso del bienestar fetal. Conclusiones: el MEF tiene una baja sensibilidad para predecir compromiso de bienestar fetal en embarazos de alto riesgo y su uso en embarazos de bajo riesgo debe evaluar el aumento de intervenciones y el potencial beneficio.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold