Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Forschungsindex und ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
EconStor
Research . 2007
Data sources: EconStor
versions View all 10 versions
addClaim

Comparison of Panel Cointegration Tests

Authors: Deniz Dilan Karaman Örsal;

Comparison of Panel Cointegration Tests

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to compare the size and size-adjusted power properties of four residual-based and one maximum-likelihood-based panel cointegration tests with the help of Monte Carlo simulations. In this study the panel-rho, the group-rho, the parametric panel-t, the parametric group-t statistics of Pedroni(1999} and the standardized LR-bar statistic of Larsson et al.(2001) are considered. The simulation results indicate that the panel-t and the standardized LR-bar statistic have the best size and power properties among the five panel cointegration test statistics evaluated.

The main aim of this paper is to compare the size and size-adjusted power properties of four residual-based and one maximum-likelihood-based panel cointegration tests with the help of Monte Carlo simulations. In this study the panel-rho, the group-rho, the parametric panel-t, the parametric group-t statistics of Pedroni(1999} and the standardized LR-bar statistic of Larsson et al.(2001} are considered. The simulation results indicate that the panel-t and the standardized LR-bar statistic have the best size and power properties among the five panel cointegration test statistics evaluated.

Country
Germany
Keywords

/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/557389186; name=Economics, Monte Carlo Study, OECD-Staaten, Panel Cointegration tests, Ökonometrie, Fisher Hypothesis, C15, C33, Panel cointegration test, Monte Carlo study, Fisher-Effekt, ddc:330, 330 Wirtschaft, Panel Cointegration tests, Monte Carlo Study, Fisher Hypothesis., /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/558839983; name=Economics, empirical/statistics, Kointegration, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2000; name=Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all), Fischer Hypothesis, Panel, Theorie, C23, PanelCointegration tests, Schätzung, jel: jel:C23, jel: jel:C1, jel: jel:C33, jel: jel:C15

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 101
    download downloads 30
  • 101
    views
    30
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
101
30
Green