Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.18452/19986
Research integrity issues fill the academic news, and include plagiarism, data falsification and image manipulation. Integrity violations are complex because of the gray zones between where bad practice ends and genuine malpractice begin. No real consensus exists about the boundaries, even though many people have strong opinions. The goal of this panel is to engage in a scholarly discussion about integrity issues using specific examples drawn from the book “Quantifying Research Integrity” (Seadle, 2017).
Everything Changes, Everything Stays the Same? Understanding Information Spaces. 15th International Symposium of Information Science (ISI 2017), Berlin, Germany, 13.03.2017 - 15.03.2017
020 Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften, data falsification, research integrity, image manipulation, ddc:020, 020 Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, plagiarism
020 Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften, data falsification, research integrity, image manipulation, ddc:020, 020 Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, plagiarism
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 98 | |
| downloads | 54 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts