
In this work, we show prospects of how mining and geological documentation in the form of drilling reports can be digitized and further processed. Processing these typed and handwritten forms poses challenges for document management in renaturation projects. We highlight the structural problems of drilling reports and present three approaches for recognizing and processing the information documented in them. We use optical character recognition and document layout analysis techniques to approach the problem. Layout analysis was performed using a heuristic approach and a neural network for layout recognition. In detail, we show the approaches Form Processing (A), Table detection by line counting (B) and processing with Mask-R-CNN (C). A case study is used to show initial results and challenges. B and C are more robust than A to small changes in the form. C can recognize columns better with more training data than B in cases where table boundaries are not respected. B and C also allow other language models to be used for OCR and can thus also recognize handwriting with appropriate training data.
renaturation projects, OCR, information extraction, drilling logs, table recognition, forms processing
renaturation projects, OCR, information extraction, drilling logs, table recognition, forms processing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
