<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.18388/pb.2018_99
pmid: 30652832
Development of the gene engineering techniques has raised worries that they will be used for construction of organism endangering humansand environment. In 1975 at the Asilomar conference, geneticists from many countries decided that genetic engineering brings more benefitsthan threats. In last years a new CRISPR-Cas technique emerged . It allows to make the precise changes in genomes, e.g. to inactivate particulargenes or to replace mutated genes by their wild-type alleles. Inactivation in mice of genes corresponding to those whose mutations causethe genetic diseases in man allows to get model organisms for studying the etiology of given disease and for working out the methods of itscuring. This technique can be applied for repairing genes whose mutations result in metabolic diseases and cancer. Some voices were raisedthat the technique can be potentially used for the “improvement” of man, what would create many ethical and social problems. Geneticists,ethicists and lawyers gathered in 2015 at the Washington conference, discussed these problems and proposed rules for their solving.
Gene Editing, Mice, Genome, Metabolic Diseases, Neoplasms, Mutation, Animals, Humans, CRISPR-Cas Systems
Gene Editing, Mice, Genome, Metabolic Diseases, Neoplasms, Mutation, Animals, Humans, CRISPR-Cas Systems
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |