Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista de la CEPALarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista de la CEPAL
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Chile: ¿Es eficaz la patente por no uso de derechos de aguas?

Authors: Christian Valenzuela; Rodrigo Fuster; Alejandro León;

Chile: ¿Es eficaz la patente por no uso de derechos de aguas?

Abstract

En este trabajo se examina si la patente por no uso de derechos de aprovechamiento de aguas implementada en Chile en 2005 ha incentivado la utilizacion de las aguas sin uso. Se analizan descriptivamente dos comparaciones: patentes cobradas respecto de recaudadas y precio de mercado de derechos comparado con el cobro de patente. Se observa que en los sucesivos procesos de cobro de patentes, la recaudacion aumento del 67% en 2007 al 81,4% en 2009 respecto del total cobrado. Ademas, se determino que varios anos de pago de patente equivalen al precio de mercado de los derechos de aguas. Se concluye que la patente no ha sido eficaz en desincentivar el no uso, puesto que los propietarios tienden a pagar lo cobrado para no perder derechos cuyos precios de mercado superan a los de las patentes. Asimismo, se sugieren algunas mejoras al diseno legal del instrumento

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze