
doi: 10.18260/1-2--36574
A curriculum on naval science & technology has been established at a midwestern university, which takes the form of an undergraduate certificate that is earned alongside a student’s major. The program began as a Certificate in Naval Hydrodynamics, and has recently expanded to also include autonomous naval systems in order to provide a broader technical background relevant to the Navy and defense contractors. Although the institution has a long history of Navy-sponsored graduate research – which provides a strong foundation for the undergraduate program -- it has not had a reputation for undergraduate instruction in naval science & technology. Thus, the program provides new opportunities for students to enter the field, and provides pathways to careers in the Navy and its contractors. However, there are unique challenges to the vitality of the program in these nascent stages. As we are developing recognition among regional high schools and employers of certificate graduates, we are dealing with small numbers of students, and students that are generally unaware of the types of career opportunities available in the field. Maintaining sustainable course enrollments is therefore a challenge, exacerbated by the technical prerequisite requirements that exclude most students in the university, limiting enrollment to engineering students (primarily mechanical engineers). In addition to expanding the program to include autonomous systems, we have employed two strategies to broaden program impact and student participation. First, the courses are designed to focus on experiential learning in a manner that provides students with a rigorous and broad education involving transferable skills such as computational fluid dynamics, experimental methods, autonomous system operations, guidance, navigation and control, and leadership. This is achieved, in part, through close student-project collaboration with experts in the Navy and industry, and close interaction with faculty in the Mechanical Engineering program. Second, we ...
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
