
During this time, the concept of tourism is only designed for people who are normal and has not been designed for disabled people. Tourism is right for human being including disabled people. Friendly tourism for persons with disabilities should provide the facility and accesibility for disabled people. Sen (2007) defines that there are three requirements for disabled people in tourism, those are: availability for accessibility, transportation, and accomodation.This research is intended to find out what extent tourism management can provide facilityand accesibility for disabled people and what the obstacles and supporting factors are to develop the friendly tourism for disabled people. This research uses qualitatif method. Tourism places proposed in this research are shopping tourism (Malioboro zone), history tourism (Taman Sari and Keraton), and educational tourism (Taman Pintar). Data collected in this research use interview technique, observation, and questioner. This sample of this research has been taken from 100 disabled tourists who travel to those three objects. The result of this research shows that the facility and accesibility provided to disabled people are still less. Moreover, there is no regulation that obligates the tourism place to serve friendly facility and accesibility for disabled people. Budget resource and human capital are still limited for tourism management to establish friendly tourism place for disabled people. Hence, the research result recommends the tourism policy maker to provide friendly facility and accesibility for disabled people.
acessibilty, H, facility, tourism, Social Sciences, disabled people, Political science, J
acessibilty, H, facility, tourism, Social Sciences, disabled people, Political science, J
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
