
doi: 10.18130/v3bb7h
Cryptographic Protocol (CP) analysis is a topic of intense research. Meadows describes four approaches for CP verification under investigation in [MEA92] and several authors have categorized protocols based on types of errors they are subject to [BIRD92], [SYV93a],[SYV93b]. This paper addresses the weakness injected into protocols when information is passed in the clear or encrypted only under the private key of a public/private key pair. We also propose a method for logically analyzing protocols based on action list analysis of valid and compromised protocol runs and of valid protocol runs interleaved with action lists of intruders conducting known attacks. Note: Abstract extracted from PDF file via OCR
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
