Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ European Ophthalmic ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
European Ophthalmic Review
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

The Role of Glaucoma Drainage Devices in Paediatric Glaucoma

Authors: Pilar Tejada Palacios; Enrique Mencía Gutiérrez; Esperanza Gutiérrez Díaz;

The Role of Glaucoma Drainage Devices in Paediatric Glaucoma

Abstract

Glaucoma drainage devices may be indicated in glaucoma associated to complex congenital anomalies or dysgenesis of the anterior segment, secondary glaucomas such as those developed after congenital cataract surgery, severe primary congenital glaucoma after failed angle surgery and in eyes with severe conjunctival scarring. They can be combined with several other procedures, such as cataract extraction, intraocular lens implantation, keratoplasty or pars plana vitrectomy. This procedure may achieve a sustained and prolonged intraocular pressure reduction in children, with early post-operative success as high as 90 %, although it decreases over time, to 40–60 % survival at 4–6 years using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and most children need to reinitiate glaucoma treatment postoperatively. We must bear in mind that complications may occur, especially tube malposition and exposure, and multiple repeated surgeries may be necessary. The advantages and complications should be weighed in each individual case.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
gold