
doi: 10.17901/995 , 10.17901/1583
“Public diplomacy” is primarily intended to support the goals of U.S. foreign policy, economic aims, and protect national interests and security by influencing the public abroad. In this, cultural and educational promotion plays a mostly subordinate role to geopolitics. The US ECP system reflects the privatized national understanding of culture, which is intended to be largely independent of the state. While such a system could create incoherence in other circumstances, the US has the luxury of falling back on its private sector sources of soft power. Indeed, even without a coherent ECP, the US dominates most of the world’s cultural, educational, and scientific fields.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
