Reconciling Accessibility Benefits with User Benefits

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Report , Research 12 Nov 2020Publisher:Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)Journal:International Transport Forum Discussion Papers (eissn: 2223-439X,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Eliasson, Jonas;

doi: 10.1787/b6458e9b-en

handle: 10419/245863

Reconciling Accessibility Benefits with User Benefits

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This paper asks whether transport policy assessments should use accessibility benefits as a key measure instead of user benefits. It argues that both measures are equivalent if accessibility measures are based on transport users' own preferences and if the same principle is used to aggregate benefits. The paper also addresses how distributional questions can be addressed within this approach.

Related Organizations

Linköping University
Sweden

Keywords

ddc:330

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

1

Average

bronze

Beta

SDGs Suggest

11. Sustainability

Beta

SDGs:

11. Sustainability,

Related to Research communities

Knowmad Institut