
doi: 10.17615/6f4v-bc46
Over the last decade, citation of archived scientific data have been the focus of intense debate. However, much of the work on data citation has centered around proposing specific formats for references. In the meantime, scientists have been creating and citing archived data sets, and we thus far lack a deep body of evidence to map the emerging best practices onto actual usage of data references. This study sketches out some of those connections by examining references to data from the Dryad Digital Repository as appearing in articles collected in PMC Europe. I collected examples of references that appear in works cited lists and intratextually, and analyzed the occurrence of references over time, both by themselves and in conjunction with several other factors. This paper offers preliminary insights into current data citation practices, which hopefully can be used to help inform the discussion surrounding data citation.
Citation of electronic information resources, Digital libraries--Evaluation
Citation of electronic information resources, Digital libraries--Evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
