
Categorizations have been, throughout human history, a means of entering known and recognized places, becoming spaces of belonging and reference with which to construct personal and collective identity and identification. Categorizations function as containers of meaning to generalize and synthesize information about certain collectives or social groups that share similar identity elements. However, when racialized people seek their place of recognition, we often place them in subjective limbo references that form spaces of discrimination and racism. In this essay, the archetypal references of the presence of whiteness as the central axis of categorization from which to place all people are studied, thus generating the invalidation of otherness and blackness. Colonial ethnocentrism establishes whiteness as a referential framework, so that those individuals who cannot be confined within white boundaries are named from absence, from a place of nominal silence that affects and problematizes the categorizations themselves.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
