
doi: 10.17169/fqs-4.1.757
Recent articles on the Grounded Theory Method (GTM) have started to analyze its conceptual and philosophical foundations. In particular it has been argued that the early characterizations by GLASER and STRAUSS exhibit a scientistic and positivist orientation that is no longer tenable. In her recent contribution to the GTM literature, CHARMAZ distinguished between objectivist GTM and constructivist GTM. This drew a response from Barney GLASER in an earlier issue of FQS. What follows is a rejoinder to GLASER, offering some clarification of developments in people's understanding of this important and widely-used qualitative approach. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0301155
Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 4, No 1 (2003): Qualitative Methods in Various Disciplines IV: Sport Sciences
H1-99, Forschungsansatz, Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, qualitative Methode, grounded theory; qualitative research; constructivism, Konstruktivismus, research approach, qualitative research; constructivism; qualitative Forschung; teoría fundamentada; investigación cualitativa; constructivismo, Social sciences (General), Forschungsarten der Sozialforschung, qualitative method, Research Design, constructivism, Grounded Theory, Social sciences, sociology, anthropology, qualitative research, grounded theory, ddc: ddc:300
H1-99, Forschungsansatz, Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, qualitative Methode, grounded theory; qualitative research; constructivism, Konstruktivismus, research approach, qualitative research; constructivism; qualitative Forschung; teoría fundamentada; investigación cualitativa; constructivismo, Social sciences (General), Forschungsarten der Sozialforschung, qualitative method, Research Design, constructivism, Grounded Theory, Social sciences, sociology, anthropology, qualitative research, grounded theory, ddc: ddc:300
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
