Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ UIC Research Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
UIC Research Journal
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

The sensitivity and specificity of rapid diagnostic test for malaria parasite in comparison to slide microscopy as gold standard

Authors: John Mark De Real;

The sensitivity and specificity of rapid diagnostic test for malaria parasite in comparison to slide microscopy as gold standard

Abstract

<p>The main objective of this study was to test the sensitivity and specificity of rapid diagnostic test for malaria parasite in comparison to slide microscopy as gold standard. Data were acquired from blood mass survey of malaria infection conducted in the community of Paquibato district, Davao City. There were 377 total participants examined through Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) and slide microscopy. Of the 377 participants tested, 16 (4.24%) of them were positive to Plasmodium falciparum and 68 (18.04%) were positive to Plasmodium vivax using slide microscopy. Of the 16 participants’ positive for P. faciparum, PfRDT (HRP-2) correctly identified 13 expressing 81.25% (low) sensitivity of the tool. Of the 68 participants’ positive for P. vivax, PvRDT (pLDH) correctly identified 65 expressing 95.59% (high) sensitivity. Both of the RDTs (HRP-2 and pLDH), however, attained 100% specificity. PfRDT (HRP-2) has a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 99.2%, likewise PvRDT (pLDH) has a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 99.04%, all in all, suggesting a high degree of reliability of SD BIOLINE Malaria Antigen P.f/P.v. the data showed no significant difference on the performance level of RDT, albeit less sensitive, compared to slide microscopy.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Health, malaria, sensitivity, specificity, HRP-2, pLDH, descriptive Davao City, Philippines.</p><div> </div>

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold