Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The nasal mucosa and outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy

Authors: A A Fedorov; V. D. Yartsev; N. N. Krakhovetsky; D. A. Rein; At'kova El; A. F. Astrakhantsev;

The nasal mucosa and outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy

Abstract

To investigate the impact of the nasal mucosa on the outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy on the basis of morphologic findings.The investigation enrolled 73 patients who had undergone endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Nasal mucosal biopsies were intraoperatively taken from all the patients. The obtained samples were subjected to standard histological examination, as well as to immunohistochemical study using an anti-alpha-smooth muscle actin antibody. To determine the intensity of inflammation in the tissue sample, a chronic inflammation score was calculated. The cell elements positively stained with α-smooth muscle actin were estimated using a semi-automatic method. The patients were divided into groups in accordance with the outcome of surgical treatment after 6 months.An unfavorable outcome of dacryocystorhinostomy was observed in 10 (13.7%) patients. The samples obtained from the patients showed a higher chronic inflammation score (8.33%) and a larger number of the cell elements positively stained with α-smooth muscle actin (6026.38±1944.29). The correlation between the outcome of surgical intervention and the quantitative characteristics of myofibroblasts was statistically significant (p<0.05).These studies suggest that there is a direct correlation of the efficiency of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with the presence and degree of chronic nasal mucosal inflammation at baseline.

Keywords

Inflammation, Nasal Mucosa, Treatment Outcome, Biopsy, Chronic Disease, Humans, Endoscopy, Dacryocystorhinostomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!