Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Transplantation of endothelium and Descemet's membrane

Authors: N S Anisimova; O P Antonova; B E Malyugin; N F Shilova;

Transplantation of endothelium and Descemet's membrane

Abstract

Nowadays, endothelial keratoplasty has become an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in the management of corneal endothelial dysfunction. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a relatively new corneal transplantation surgery technique suited for patients with endothelial insufficiency, an increasing number of surgeons are learning the graft preparation technique and the surgery itself after seeing its excellent postoperative visual outcomes and faster rehabilitation of patients. DMEK has significant advantages in comparison with automated and manual Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK/DSEK) and PKP including lower risk of immunologic graft rejection (1-2%), lower cost of the procedure, and it does not require expensive equipment such as a microkeratome or a femtosecond laser device. Another advantage is that the corneal graft tissue can be used for several recipients - e.g. when the Descemet's membrane and endothelium are used for a patient with endothelial dysfunction of the cornea, the retained stroma and epithelium can be then used for another patient with pathology of these corneal layers. Key problematic issues regarding this surgery are the technical difficulties during graft preparation and during surgery itself, however the majority of surgeons report very good results after gaining some experience. The article reviews latest clinical trials on DMEK and describes its strengths and weaknesses.

Keywords

Cornea, Corneal Transplantation, Endothelium, Corneal, Humans, Endothelium, Descemet Membrane, Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty, Keratoplasty, Penetrating, Corneal Diseases

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?