Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Prevalence and predictors of adverse effects of medical care in patients with cleft lip and palate undergoing facial bone repairs and orthognathic surgical procedures in the United States

Authors: Kirsten Frazier; Kyungsup Shin; Shankar Rengasamy Venugopalan; Veeratrishul Allareddy; Veerasathpurush Allareddy;

Prevalence and predictors of adverse effects of medical care in patients with cleft lip and palate undergoing facial bone repairs and orthognathic surgical procedures in the United States

Abstract

<p>BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE: Almost 15% of newborns have congenital anomalies that involve the oral and craniofacial regions, but of these congenital anomalies, cleft lip and palate and craniosynostosis are the most common. It is estimated that the incidence of cleft lip and palate is 0.664 in 1000 live births. These patients commonly have skeletal imbalances of the maxillae and mandible that require surgical and orthodontic correction. Orthodontists and oral surgeons play a critical role in identifying the necessary care and ensuring that the patient receives the best quality of care possible.</p> <p>OBJECTIVES: The objective of the current study is to examine the prevalence of adverse effects of medical care and infectious complications in patients with cleft lip/palate undergoing facial bone repairs/orthognathic surgeries in the United States during the years 2012 to 2014. It will also examine the association between patient/hospital related factors and surgical outcomes (including adverse affects of surgery, incidence of infection, etc.) and how these surgical outcomes impact the hospital costs and length of stay in the hospital.</p> <p>MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) is a 20% stratified probability sample of hospitalizations occurring in all acute care hospitals in the United States. It is part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [12]. Each hospital in this sample provides information on 20% of hospitalizations occurring during the select years. Hospital stratification is based on multiple hospital-associated variables including: hospital location, geographic region, bed size, teaching status, and ownership/control. Each hospitalization is assigned a sampling weight. Patient-related variables are also provided by the hospitals. In this study, this information is used to provide a nationally representative estimate of all hospitalizations and associated outcomes in the United States from 2012-2014.</p> <p>RESULTS: This study includes all 1,785 patients with cleft lip/palate undergoing facial bone repair/orthognathic surgical procedures in the United States during the study period (2012-2014). These results confirm the hypothesis that there are a combination of patient and hospital related factors that contribute to the occurrence of adverse events and that the occurrence of these events is associated with substantial increases in hospital charges and length of hospital stay.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: These study results are a national representative sample of patients with cleft lip/palate undergoing bony facial repair and orthognathic surgery. They reflect the practice patterns and hospitalization outcomes across the United States. These results can serve as a platform for future prospective controlled studies to examine the risk factors associated with adverse effects of medical care for a wide range of surgical procedures. This information is useful for clinicians, health policy makers, and patients so that they can make informed treatment and policy decisions as well as continue to improve surgical procedures and outcomes.</p>

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!