Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggre...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
LSHTM Data Compass
Thesis . 2013
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Biochemical and immunochemical studies on ticks (Ixodida: Ixodidae)

Authors: Trinder, Peter Karl Edmund;

Biochemical and immunochemical studies on ticks (Ixodida: Ixodidae)

Abstract

In developing a vaccine against \ud Rhipicephalus \ud appendiculatus, \ud an \ud important tick ectoparasite of \ud livestock in \ud Africa, \ud a necessary \ud first step is identification of \ud antigens \ud which \ud give \ud protective \ud immunity. Antigen profiles of extracts of \ud unfed \ud immature \ud and \ud adult Rh. appendiculatus ticks and \ud their fractions \ud were \ud compared \ud by immunoblotting with sera raised \ud against \ud tick infestation and \ud against \ud whole or fractionated extracts. \ud Several \ud antigens \ud (51.5, 40, 36.5 \ud and 23kDa) were observed \ud to \ud be \ud absent \ud in \ud extracts \ud of \ud fed \ud or \ud partially fed adult ticks. Antigens \ud of \ud 84, 60 \ud and \ud 40kDa \ud were \ud consistently detected in \ud extract \ud fractions \ud shown \ud in \ud immunisation/tick challenge experiments \ud to \ud be immunogenic. \ud The \ud 60kDa antigen was found both in \ud soluble and membrane \ud fractions, \ud whilst the 84 and 40kDa antigens \ud did \ud not appear \ud to \ud be \ud membrane \ud associated. The 84 and \ud 40kDa \ud species \ud appeared \ud heavily \ud glycosylated with a broad range \ud of carbohydrate \ud moieties \ud being \ud present. The 60kDa antigen \ud did \ud not \ud bind \ud significantly \ud to \ud any of \ud the lectins used, suggesting only \ud minimal \ud glycosylation. \ud Probing \ud extracts of unfed larval ticks \ud of \ud different \ud species with serum \ud raised against an immunogenic fraction \ud of \ud Rh. appendiculatus \ud unfed nymphal extract revealed \ud 60kDa \ud antigen \ud species \ud in \ud each \ud of \ud the five different tick species. Immunostaining \ud of sections of \ud unfed adult female Rh. appendiculatus \ud illustrated \ud marked \ud differences in the distribution of antigens \ud associated \ud with adult \ud tick feed and those associated with \ud immunisation \ud with \ud extracts \ud of unfed nymphal ticks and their fractions. \ud Of the \ud unfed \ud immature \ud Rh. appendiculatus extract \ud fractions \ud used \ud in immunisation \ud and \ud adult tick challenge feed experiments \ud in \ud guinea \ud pigs, \ud SEHPLC \ud fraction 2 and the 45% ammonium sulphate supernate \ud fraction \ud were \ud found to be the most protective. \ud The \ud prospects \ud for \ud developing \ud an \ud anti-Rh. appendiculatus vaccine are \ud discussed, \ud and antigen purification strategies are suggested.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities