
pmid: 28256447
AbstractAim. We reviewed a large surgical cohort to investigate the clinical manifestations, EEG and neuroimaging findings, and postoperative seizure outcome in patients with drug‐resistant parietal lobe epilepsy (PLE).Methods. All drug‐resistant PLE patients, who were investigated for epilepsy surgery at Jefferson Comprehensive Epilepsy Center between 1986 and 2015, were identified. Demographic data, seizure data, EEG recordings, brain MRI, pathological findings, and postsurgical seizure outcome were reviewed.Results. In total, 18 patients (11 males and seven females) were identified. Sixteen patients (88%) had tonic‐clonic seizures, 12 (66%) had focal seizures with impaired awareness, and 13 (72%) described auras. Among 15 patients who had brain MRI, 14 patients (93%) had parietal lobe lesions. Only three of 15 patients (20%) who had interictal scalp EEG recordings showed parietal interictal spikes. Of 12 patients with available ictal surface EEG recordings, only three patients (25%) had parietal ictal EEG onset. After a mean follow‐up duration of 8.6 years, 14 patients (77.7%) showed a favourable postoperative seizure outcome.Conclusion. In patients with PLE, semiology and EEG may be misleading and brain MRI is the most valuable tool to localize the epileptogenic zone. Postsurgical seizure outcome was favourable in our patients with drug‐resistant parietal lobe epilepsy.
Adult, Male, Drug Resistant Epilepsy, Adolescent, Electroencephalography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult, Seizures, Parietal Lobe, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Female, Epilepsies, Partial, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Drug Resistant Epilepsy, Adolescent, Electroencephalography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult, Seizures, Parietal Lobe, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Female, Epilepsies, Partial, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
