
pmid: 23906568
Complex interactions existing between cardiac and renal diseases led to define 5 types of so-called cardiorenal syndromes. This classification is based on the organ primarily involved and the acute or chronic failure. The mutual impact of renal and cardiac functions makes it difficult to evaluate and manage patients with cardiorenal syndromes and worsen morbidity and mortality. This review seeks to discuss the place of biomarkers in diagnosis, management and follow-up of patients with cardiorenal syndromes. Biomarkers can be classified as functional (creatinine, cystatin C…) or lesional (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, urinary cystatin C…) renal markers and functional (natriuretic peptides…) or lesional (troponin, fatty acid binding protein) cardiac markers. A last kind of biomarkers reflects the dialogue between heart and kidney (renin-angiotensin-aldosteron-system, indicators of activation of arginine vasopressin system) or the systemic impact (inflammation, oxidative stress…). In order to evaluate accurately the complex interactions that are the basis of cardiorenal syndromes, a multi-marker approach seems nowadays necessary.
Cardio-Renal Syndrome, Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins, Lipocalins, Troponin, Arginine Vasopressin, Renin-Angiotensin System, Lipocalin-2, Creatinine, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Humans, Cystatin C, Natriuretic Peptides, Biomarkers, Acute-Phase Proteins
Cardio-Renal Syndrome, Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins, Lipocalins, Troponin, Arginine Vasopressin, Renin-Angiotensin System, Lipocalin-2, Creatinine, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Humans, Cystatin C, Natriuretic Peptides, Biomarkers, Acute-Phase Proteins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
