
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients submitted to surgery for hip fracture through the ASA score and time for definitive surgical treatment. METHOD: During one year, 154 patients with hip fractures, aged 65 years and over, were operated on. Data from the pre-operative ASA score and time awaiting operation were obtained. Two years after the operation, Zuckerman's Functional Recovery Score (FRS) questionnaire was used to assess the current functional capacity of the patients. RESULTS: Mortality in the first post-operative year was different between patients with an ASA 3 or 4 compared to those classified as ASA 1 or 2 group (significant data p 0.05). There was no significant difference between the group operated within 48 hours of admission and the group operated after 48 hours in relation to mortality or current functional capacity (p>0.05). The group aged 80 and over showed significantly higher mortality than the group aged 65 to 79 years through the end of the second post-operative year (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: A preoperative ASA score and an age of 80 or over may be considered factors associated with higher mortality two years post-operatively after hip fracture. In isolation, time awaiting surgery was not significant.
Hip Fractures, Saúde do Idoso, Postoperative Period, Health of the Elderly, Período Pós-Operatório, Fraturas do Quadril
Hip Fractures, Saúde do Idoso, Postoperative Period, Health of the Elderly, Período Pós-Operatório, Fraturas do Quadril
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
