
This paper addresses the issue of Unconditional or Stochastic Maximum likelihood (SML) estimation of directions-of-arrival (DOA) finding using sensors with arbitrary array configuration. The conventional SML estimation is formulated without an important condition that the covariance matrix of signal components must be non-negative definite. An likelihood function can not be evaluated exactly for all possible sets of directions. First, this paper reveals that the conventional SML has three problems due to the lack of the condition. 1) Solutions in the noise-free case are not unique. 2) Global solution in the noisy case becomes ambiguous occasionally. 3) There exist situations that any local solution does not satisfy the condition of the non-negative definiteness. We propose an exact formulation of the SML estimation of DOA to evaluate an likelihood function exactly for any possible set of directions. The proposed formulation can be utilized without any theoretical difficulty. The three problems of the conventional SML are solved by the proposed exact SML estimation. Furthermore we show a local search technique in the conventional SML has a good chance to find an optimal or suboptimal DOA although the suboptimal solutions violate the condition of the non-negative definiteness. Finally some simulation results are shown to demonstrate good estimation properties of the exact SML estimation.
signal covariance matrix, coherent signals, global and local search methods, non-negative definiteness, stochastic maximum likelihood (SML) estimation
signal covariance matrix, coherent signals, global and local search methods, non-negative definiteness, stochastic maximum likelihood (SML) estimation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
