
doi: 10.1587/elex.3.322
Turbo code is recommended as a channel coding scheme, which has been shown to be capable of performing close to the Shannon Limit. In this paper, we compare the performance of both convolutional and block turbo codes over AWGN and Rayleigh fading channels. It is observed that the performance of convolutional turbo code is slightly better in the water fall region and the coding gain ranges from 0.5 to 0.7dB at BER of 10-4 depending on the channel conditions. But below BER of 10-4 or 10-5 an error floor occurs in the case of convolutional turbo code. Block turbo codes tend to outperform convolutional turbo codes for low BER.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
