
doi: 10.1586/era.12.1
pmid: 22369331
Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is currently associated with survival rates as high as 70%. However, many events still occur, side effects are significant, and late effects occur and can even be life-threatening. Thus, the treatment of pediatric AML still needs further improvement. While most study groups agree on several principles of AML treatment, many unanswered questions and even controversies remain, which will be the topic of this review. Relapsed AML, the most frequent event in children, will also be discussed. The controversies justify future clinical studies. Fortunately, biotechnical developments provide novel treatment targets and targeted drugs, and will enable minimal residual disease-driven tailored therapy. Moreover, a wide range of new drugs is being developed. International collaboration is required to perform randomized, or even single-arm clinical studies, in this setting of subgroup-directed therapy, and fortunately is being accomplished. Therefore, optimism is justified and the treatment of pediatric AML will continue to improve.
Complementary Therapies, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Clinical Trials as Topic, Neoplasm, Residual, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Therapies, Investigational, Cytarabine, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Induction Chemotherapy, Maintenance Chemotherapy, Survival Rate, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Treatment Outcome, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Secondary Prevention, Humans, Transplantation, Homologous, Anthracyclines, Child
Complementary Therapies, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Clinical Trials as Topic, Neoplasm, Residual, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Therapies, Investigational, Cytarabine, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Induction Chemotherapy, Maintenance Chemotherapy, Survival Rate, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Treatment Outcome, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Secondary Prevention, Humans, Transplantation, Homologous, Anthracyclines, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
