Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Management of high defibrillation threshold

Authors: Eric R, Uyguanco; Aaron, Berger; Adam S, Budzikowski; Moshe, Gunsburg; John, Kassotis;

Management of high defibrillation threshold

Abstract

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has become the primary therapy for the treatment of potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. Ventricular arrhythmias encompass a spectrum of rhythm disturbances ranging from the occasional monomorphic ventricular premature complex to the almost universally fatal ventricular fibrillation. Our understanding of the mechanisms of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation is still in evolution. At present, the most common ICD configuration consists of a pectoral pulse generator (active-can) with a bipolar transvenous dual coil lead. A transvenous system with an active-can has improved defibrillation thresholds and the ease of implantation. However, there are various clinical scenarios in which patients with high defibrillation threshold (DFT) are encountered. Although the incidence of high DFT patients is low, it is of significant concern since it may account for sudden cardiac death in patients with ICDs. At present, there are few clinical trials that are rigorous and well designed, and which can define a perfect methodology for the treatment of high DFT patients. In this review, in the context of commonly encountered clinical scenarios, we discuss therapeutic strategies to help manage patients with high DFT.

Keywords

Clinical Trials as Topic, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Ventricular Fibrillation, Electric Countershock, Animals, Differential Threshold, Humans, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Defibrillators, Implantable

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!