Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

(Nie)ruchome wahadło? Ptolemeusz, Kopernik i trójkąt von Hayeka a współczesny kryzys gospodarczy

Authors: Tomasz Ceran;

(Nie)ruchome wahadło? Ptolemeusz, Kopernik i trójkąt von Hayeka a współczesny kryzys gospodarczy

Abstract

AT THE END of the 20th century the Conservative Revolution (Thatcherism and Reagan’s economy) dismantled the post-war consensus and welfare state policy of the West. In the East the communist system collapsed. Francis Fukuyama declared “The end of History”. Even People’s Republic of China started to share the free market economy views. When global financial crisis has broken out in 2008, the “unmovable” pendulum of political and social thought came back into motion. A year later the Nobel Prize in Economics was given to Elinor Ostrom, who believed in common-pool resources and management by local community rather than typical private ownership. According to left -wing thinkers the crisis was the end of capitalism and free economy rules. History shows us that we are unable to avoid periodical crises in this matter, though capitalism is not dead. The free market economy principals are not obsolete. Like Copernicus’ theory, they are not brand new but still up to date. Returning to classical views on welfare is like supporting Ptolemy’s vision of world (and space). Nowadays only the effective social policy is desirable and acceptable. Among classical ideologies “cruel” liberalism is the winner. However it doesn’t mean that the ideological pendulum has been stopped. Edmund Burke claimed that “a state without means of some chance is without the means of its conservation”. It is exactly the same with the liberal thought.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!