Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Comparison of Gypsum and MICP in Stabilizing an Expansive Soil

Authors: Venrgoti Sudhaka; Thokalapudi Suresh; CH. Sudha Rani;

Comparison of Gypsum and MICP in Stabilizing an Expansive Soil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Expansive soils are considered problematic for civil engineering applications due to their low strength, high compressibility, and poor bearing capacity, which limit their use as foundation or pavement subgrade materials. To overcome these limitations, this study investigates the stabilization of expansive soil using gypsum and Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) as strengthening agents. The experimental program was carried out in three stages. In the first stage, gypsum, an industrial by-product, was incorporated into the soil in varying proportions of 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% by dry weight. The treated samples were tested for Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR). The results revealed a significant improvement in strength with increasing gypsum content up to 4%, beyond which a slight reduction was observed. Thus, 4% gypsum was identified as the optimum content for stabilization. In the second stage, MICP treatment was applied by introducing bacterial solutions in concentrations of 2 ml, 4 ml, 6 ml, 8 ml, and 10 ml under optimum moisture conditions. The treated samples were tested for Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR). The results revealed a significant improvement in strength with increasing MICP content up to 4ml-MICP, beyond which a slight reduction was observed. Thus, 4ml-MICP was identified as the optimum content for stabilization. In the final stage, 4% gypsum and MICP (4 ml MICP concentration) were combined and applied to new soil samples to evaluate the combined effect on strength enhancement. However, the results showed a decrease in strength in the UCS test. The comparative analysis indicated that the individual treatments performed better depending on the curing period. Overall, the study demonstrates that gypsum provides a more sustainable improvement when compared to MICP, whereas MICP offers a more cost-effective solution. Both gypsum and MICP are environmentally friendly stabilizers suitable for enhancing the performance of expansive soils in geotechnical and pavement applications

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold